Tweeting the Emmys

Last night was the Emmys, with Modern Family, Mad Men and Temple Grandin taking home the big prizes. I took to twitter last night to write about them live as they were happening. Here’s the recap, and follow us at twitter.com/storps to see it there.

Let’s do this, Twitter Nation! Emmy night begins soon. I’ll be tweeting here through the night as the show goes on. -JR

On the couch with 4 minutes to spare. And rewarded with Sofia Vergara. Nice.

First Conan joke of the night! Poehler’s looking pregnant. Strong first 8 minutes. (Post-note: Poehler’s not actually pregnant, but she had her baby about a month ago. Mess-up by me on that one.)

As comedy starts, here’s my top 6 in my comedy power rankingshttp://www.storps.com/2010/08/09/comedy-power-rankings-part-2/

Stonestreet FTW!!! Good for him! Amazing year for him, and he deserved it.

Did the Emmys spoil the winner there? Sounded like they played the Modern Family theme before it was announced.

BTW, just got back from a trip to Cle, Chi (primarily), Mil, and Pitt. Lots of laundry to do. Great trip.

Modern! 2 for 2! Are we feeling sweep?

Greg Daniels: “I’m Rick James, Bitch!” Well, that was a highlight.

Good for Jane Lynch. Thoroughly deserved. South Side of Chicago! I was just there a day ago!

I just realized: This comedy part is gonna be over soon. The thing I care about most is comedy. Uh oh. Could be a long night.

Fallon did a nice job with the cold open, but he’s looked nervous since. Perry and Graham just tanked. Gotta love hilarious Emmy writing!

Glee answers back with 2 in a row! It’s on like Donkey Kong. Is that still on? Is that on anywhere? Either way…the showdown is on.

I feel like Ryan Murphy is an a-hole. He hasn’t really done anything to deserve that. But…might be an a-hole.

Modern answers with a great skit. Business has picked up.

It’s sad that The Office isn’t really a factor in the top comedies right now. A real shame. Let’s hope Carell’s swan song turns it around.

September 8th, 2011: The day I watch You Again on HBO, hide my head in shame, don’t tell anyone, and secretly enjoy it.

Shhhh Jeremy, NPH is on.

So…now what? Baseball time? Special sneak preview of You Again?

Gob Bluth…you’re better than lame banter. COME ON!!!!

The Amazing Race is down, and it can’t get up! Down goes Frasier!

Anyone notice that when the announcer starts talking about the dramatic actors, her voice gets lower? Like they’re more important? Weird.

I’ve never watched Oprah a day in my life, yet these commercials are getting me choked up. What will I do without her?!?!

I’m hungry. What should I eat? Athlete tweet translation: I’m staaaaaarvin y’all!! What should I eat I could eat a horse right now lol!!!!!!

Malcolm Reynolds in the house. Rose Byrne: Underrated hotness.

We’re getting close to that time. Kyle and Connie coming up soon. Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can’t Lose.

Bryan Cranston’s daughter…like her. I like her more than baseball, too.

Tyler Perry…really, America?

Ok, America, we get it. Matthew Morrison’s hair is funny. Can we stop now?

A big 0 for 2 for FNL. Crap. Hopefully next year it gets what it deserves. 2011: Wins for Carell, Chandler and Britton? One can dream.

Broadway love!!! The Tonies in da house! Broadway baby! Wooooooooo!

Chase: potential for NBC? It might be good. Wow Gervais looks good.

Gervais killing it at the Emmys: a new yearly tradition. Love it.

Next segment’s prospects are bleak. Folding laundry it is!

Doesn’t Juliana Margulies have an oddly deep voice? Has anyone ever mentioned this?

Clooney, how dare your humanitarian efforts make Betty White have to stand up? She’s tired!

Really nice, honest speech by Clooney. I feel like I should think he’s a d-bag, but I just don’t.

Who’s watching these Cranford movies? They’re nominated every year. Do you know one person who has EVER watched this series???

Can’t get over this Cranford thing. Return to Cranford? Who watches this?

Emminated for a nommy. Funny by Ormond. Seriously. Name me one person who’s watched Cranford and I’ll give you a thousand dollars.

What’s the correlation between ’serious dramatic indie actor’ and ‘growing a dignified beard’? Why do the two always coexist?

So, Temple Grandin is a person? Not a temple? I didn’t wanna watch some religious thing. Oops.

I’m ready for the Jewel comeback. So ready. She just does it for me.

Is there anything better than awards show banter? At all?

So, we have a black president now…is it okay to make a TV show with a white president while the real one is black? Is that kosher?

So, what’s the over/under on mainstream media ‘worshiping Temple Grandin’ puns tomorrow? 20?

Closing with comedy this year. If lost would win, it would close.

Bingo. Mad Men it is. Way to go out on a limb there, academy.

That being said, thrilled that comedy is getting its due this year. Modern Family! Glee! It’s the Emmys on NBC!

Here we go…

Modern!! Good for them. Totally and completely deserved, and hopefully this takes the show to the next level.

That’ll do it here. Off to catch up on 2 episodes of Entourage, which wasn’t represented at the Emmys tonight. Could it be because it sucks?

Thanks for reading, Twitter Nation. Check back to Storps for more updates, and here on Twitter. Goodnight!

August 30, 2010 · Filed under Pop Culture

No Comments

The Worship of False Idols

For the last few years, I’ve kept a running list in my head. I started watching sports in the early 1990s, but my memory of certain teams and players doesn’t have a clear starting date. I remember some teams before others, and some players before other ones. As I’ve gotten older, the players that I grew up with have as well, and almost all have retired. The list that I’ve kept has been of players that I can’t remember their teams without them being on it. There have been some players where I can’t remember their teams without them being on it, and then some players where I can’t remember the sport without them being in the league. I’ve started to include managers that have stuck with one team on the list, too. In these past few weeks, the list got shorter when Mike Modano signed with the Red Wings, leaving the Dallas Stars after 20 years. He was the last Minnesota North Star, and a staple of American hockey for the last two decades. With his signing with the Red Wings, the only hockey player that I can’t remember his team without is Nicklas Lidstrom of the Red Wings. There are no players in the NBA or NFL that qualify, and only Tim Wakefield remains in the MLB. (Now, you might think that if Tim Wakefield qualifies from 1995, then Martin Brodeur should surely qualify, since he came to the Devils in 1993 full time, after a brief cameo in 1992. But, I remember the Devils before Brodeur, since I grew up learning about hockey by going to primarily Devils games. I remember the goalie tandem of Craig Billington and Chris Terreri before Brodeur came around, but for some reason I don’t remember the Red Sox before Wakefield. My list, my rules.) As I’ve extended the list to managers and coaches, I realized that the about-to-retire Bobby Cox, Jerry Sloan, and Jeff Fisher make the cut.

The list remains at just Lidstrom, Wakefield, Cox, Sloan and Fisher. There are many more managers that I can’t remember their leagues without, but that list gets too long. This last has become more and more of an endangered species recently. In the last few years, Joe Sakic, Brett Favre, Bill Cowher, Michael Strahan, John Smoltz, Mike Shanahan and Steve Yzerman have all come off of this list. But, it makes sense. Most teams I started remembering in the early 90s, between 1990 and 1993. It’s now 2010, so if the guys were 23 in 1993, they’re 40 now. It’s not surprising. But, in some way, it’s sad. We all look at sports differently as a little kid. As we grow up, we look at these players as heroes on our TVs; guys that can do no wrong, even if they make a misstep once in awhile. But once those guys retire, and we’re mature enough to see these guys for who they are, what’s really left?

Now that I’m 23 years old and have become a marginally responsible adult, it’s a lot easier to see athletes for who they are on a more personal level. As I wrote in my Oliver Perez column, some of these athletes may just be regular guys who happen to be really good at one particular job that pays handsomely. They don’t have to be super-competitive freaks of nature that are willing to sacrifice themselves at all costs in order to win. They might just be guys doing their jobs. It’s also a lot easier to see the bad apples in the bunch, and a lot harder to forgive guys like K-Rod for doing what he did last week to get himself arrested. When we look at the game from a strictly person-to-person level, it’s a lot tougher to idolize the players. I can be disappointed about the fact that Derek Jeter is having among his worst years in his career, but then I remember that he gets to go home to Minka Kelly every night, one of the hottest actresses on TV. Life isn’t bad for Mr. Jeter. Once we learn too much about certain players, the mystique of them goes away, and so does the idolatry. Last week, I tried to change all of that.

Last Tuesday, my podcast co-conspirator Allen Pines and I decided to take a one day road trip from New Jersey to Washington D.C., all in the name of seeing Stephen Strasburg pitch. Coming into last Tuesday’s game, he was 5-2 with a low 2.32 ERA, and had a sparkling 75 strikeouts in only 54 innings pitched. We were looking forward to hitting the road for a day out of town, but the main reason we were going was to see the phenom pitch. Here was a guy that is almost exactly one year younger than me, almost to the day. Outside of his amazing ability to pitch, I know almost nothing about him. I know he was a great pitcher in college, but that’s about it. He had his worst start of his young career while we were there, but the mood remained positive afterwards. We had all seen a young star, just as he was figuring it all out. It was an exciting place to be.

For the last week, I’ve had this running question in my head: How do the retirements of so many of the players that I grew up with as a kid, and the borderline insanity of driving 9 hours in one day to see Strasburg pitch relate? Why would I do something that extreme in order to see a player, when I’ve learned in past years not to idolize them? What’s the point of idolizing someone that’s so unproven, and someone that’s younger than me? After letting it fester in my brain for the past week, I came to this conclusion: we all idolize what we haven’t seen before. When we were younger, we idolized all of the players that we saw, because we hadn’t seen anything like it before. People playing the games that we loved to play in our backyards at this high of a level? Unprecedented. We sought their autographs, wanted to meet them, bought their baseball cards, and wanted to learn as much about them as we possibly could. As we got older, we started to see more and more repetition in the sports. Of course we cheered on our teams, but it wasn’t quite as special as when we were little kids and everything was new. Whenever we can find something that we haven’t seen before, it’s a lot easier for us to idolize it. And that’s why we went to see Strasburg. How many 22-year-old starting pitchers have come into their rookie seasons and dominated the National League like Strasburg has? Not many, if any ever. It’s a new phenomenon to see a pitcher pitch like that. Rangers fans idolize Mark Messier because he brought the vast majority of them something new, that they hadn’t ever seen in their lives: a Stanley Cup. Anyone under the age of 60 in 1994 couldn’t have remembered the Rangers winning the cup, so since he did something totally new, he was idolized as if his fans were little kids. And let’s be honest: As a Rangers, Magic and Yankees fan, I’d be much more excited to see either the Rangers or Magic win a championship than for the Yankees to win another World Series. Sure, I’d be very excited and happy to see the Yankees defend their crown, but it’s something that I’ve seen 5 times in my life already. Although I remember 1994 like it was yesterday, another Rangers title would mean a whole lot more to me, since I was only 6 when they won it last. And, of course, the Magic winning the NBA Title would mean a ton, since they’ve never done it. It would be an entirely new experience. We all want to see what we’ve never seen before. That’s why we have a special love for the players in our childhood, normal people like me would drive for 9 hours to see a kid pitcher on a last place team, and we all care so much about our teams winning championships. In the sports world, at least, what we haven’t seen before is very, very exciting.

August 18, 2010 · Filed under MLB, NHL

No Comments

Tales of Rothschild (Baseball Edition)

It’s time for another Tales of Rothschild, where, in the spirit of the opera The Tales of Hoffman, I pick three stories to write about that have something in common. Today, let’s look at three baseball stories, all having something to do with a New York player or team.

1.  A Cy Young Dark Horse

In the National League, it looks like Ubaldo Jimenez is the obvious front-runner for the Cy Young Award, with Adam Wainwright in a close second. Nobody else will challenge either one for the honor. In the AL, it’s a different story. There’s no obvious front runner, with David Price, Clay Buchholz and CC Sabathia looking like contenders, but it’d be tough to say which really has the obvious advantage. With no clear top candidate, how about Mariano Rivera? He took the loss on Tuesday against Texas, in a rare poor performance for him this year, but his season remains outstanding and borderline absurd. He has 23 saves to only 2 blown saves, and his era is at 1.09, and was as low as 0.88 before giving up the run to Texas. The 23 saves don’t look that impressive, but the Yankees have had an odd way of either winning by 4 or 5 runs or losing by about that many, so the work for him hasn’t been as much as in past years. This has been as good a season for him as any in his career, and it would be a shame if the best closer of the era went his entire baseball life without winning a major award, assuming that we’re not taking the Rolaids relief award as a big time thing. New rule, in the words of Bill Maher: If you get a sponsor for your award, and the sponsor is a heartburn medicine to take after eating a few too many chicken wings at Hooters, we aren’t going to take you seriously. If he were to win the award, skeptics would claim that the Cy Young isn’t meant to be a lifetime achievement award, and should reward the best of the best. It’s a fair point, but there really hasn’t been a more dominant pitcher than Rivera. Price was hit hard at Yankee Stadium in a big game for his Rays a few weeks ago, Buchholz is still young and proving himself, and Sabathia has been shaky on more than a few occasions. Cliff Lee could be in the discussion as well, but he didn’t put up incredible numbers in Seattle, and voters rarely reward a pitcher that switches teams midseason. Rivera has given up 5 earned runs this season. Not this month, or in his last 10 outings. This ENTIRE year. That’s pretty unbelievable. Despite his loss against the Rangers, he needs to be in the discussion. He’s going to be 41 after the season. There’s no better time than the present to give an award of this magnitude to a pitcher that has endured like Rivera has.

2. Teixeira, Dunn, and the Post-Steroids Era

After a very slow start, Mark Teixeira has put the Yankees on his back for the last few weeks, and with 26 home runs and 85 rbi, he’s put himself in a position to hit around 35 to 40 homers this year, and drive in between 110 and 120 runs. He joined a small class of players that have hit at least 25 home runs in the first eight years of their careers, which is something that hasn’t been done often. Despite never playing for a contender, Adam Dunn continues to be a force with the long ball, hitting 30 home runs already this year. He’s well on his way to another 40 home run season. His numbers throughout his career are ridiculously consistent, as for the last 6 years he’s hit between 38 and 46 home runs every year, and driven in between 92 and 106 runs in every year since 2004. There’s no reason why he wouldn’t hit almost exactly to those numbers again this year. Teixeira turned 30 at the beginning of the season, and at this point has 268 home runs to his record. Dunn turns 31 in November, and is sitting at 346 homers thus far. Teixeira looks to have a chance to get near 500 home runs in his career, if he keeps it up, and Dunn could exceed that with 4 or 5 more years of putting up his consistent numbers. Neither guy has ever had a sniff of PEDs attached to them. Both are considered to be good guys without any sort of track record  of controversy. In any other era, both players would be prime candidates to be on their way to Cooperstown. But in 2010, can we really be sure?

I’ve said this before, and I’ll likely say it again: The entire steroid era doesn’t really resonate with me as being that terrible. Players needed to keep up with the times, and they did what they needed to do in order to succeed. Is it morally right? Probably not. But I understand the rationale, and I don’t really begrudge them. But, ethics of the era notwithstanding, the numbers that players put up are ridiculously inflated and are impossible to compare to the current day and age. A couple of weeks ago, I watched part of the 2000 MLB All Star Game on the MLB Network. It was the heart of the steroids era, and the numbers were through the roof. Ivan Rodriguez strolled to the plate. The league leader for home runs at the 2010 All Star Game was 23 by Jose Bautista, and Josh Hamilton led the league at the time with 77 RBI. Here were Pudge’s numbers: .366, 26 HR, 80 RBI. And he wasn’t even leading the league! He was a catcher! I went to Washington DC to see the Nationals play the Marlins (another story for another time), and Pudge had 2 home runs on the year as he was playing in mid-August. That’s just crazy. The point is, when players like Rodriguez put up those numbers only ten years ago, it makes Dunn and Teixeira look worse by comparison. When countless players from the era hit 500 home runs and weren’t even close to the best players at their positions, how are we supposed to evaluate what these two first basemen are doing? Most people wouldn’t claim that Fred McGriff, Carlos Delgado, Rafael Palmeiro or Jim Thome were ever indisputably the best first basemen in baseball. Yet, they each hit over or around 500 home runs for their careers. When Dunn and Teixeira put their eventual career numbers against those, they’ll at best look like equals, when in reality they were better.

And that’s where the shame of the steroids era comes in. I’ll never get worked up about the game being ‘disgraced’, because I think that’s a really immature way of looking at it. But baseball records are so strongly based on numbers that losing the ability to compare players from different generations is really too bad. It will hurt these two, and it will hurt fans in the future that want to learn the history of the game. That’s really a bummer.

3. The Mets Fade Into Obscurity; Now What?

The Mets have faded away in the last month and a half, and it looks like another year without a playoff race for the Mets fans. They haven’t won back to back games since June 23^rd, and they still haven’t won a road series against an NL team. Things have gotten ugly, fast. With this season all but over, it’s time to put it in the rearview mirror and look at where they can go from here. Fred Wilpon said last week that Omar Minaya will be keeping his job next year, since he has another year on his contract. With money tight and rumors flying about exactly how much money the Wilpons lost to Bernie Madoff, it doesn’t look like they’ll be letting go of people that don’t have expiring contracts. That being said (courtesy of Jerry Seinfeld), the Mets need to send a message to their fans. It’s one thing to tolerate another losing season, but something altogether different about letting players that aren’t contributing continue to play, only because of their contracts. Here’s my three-step process towards a brighter future for the Mets.

-Fire Jerry Manuel…today. He’ has an expiring deal, and keeping him at this point is just making the ownership look like they’re accepting what’s happening. Wally Backman can be promoted cheaply, so it wouldn’t cost a whole lot more money to bring him in, even on an interim basis. Even if the Mets have to live with the laughable Razor Shines as the manager for 2 months, the world will go on. But keeping Manuel just makes management seem lazy, even if not everything that’s happened has been his fault. There’s no better way to send a message than to fire the manager. He’s the fall guy, and it’s not all his fault, but that’s part of being an MLB manager. These things happen.

-Cut Oliver Perez and Luis Castillo. I know that only two paragraphs ago I said that the Mets can’t cut salary of players that have contracts next year, but this is an exception, and the cost wouldn’t be much more anyway. Ruben Tejada can be the regular second baseman next year, and he’s not making more than a few hundred thousand dollars a year, so Castillo is expendable, despite owing him money. Perez hasn’t been in the starting rotation for the Mets since late-April, so it’s not like they really need to replace him. He’s owed a good amount of money next year, so he should be cut, despite my defense of him a few weeks ago. The Mets need to send the message that positions on the team will be earned based on merit, and not due to the mistakes ownership has made with long-term contracts. This would be a good start. With that in mind…

-Promote Angel Pagan and Josh Thole to regular starters on Opening Day. Like I said before, it’s time for the Mets to start giving out positions based on what players have done, and not what they make. Pagan has been the most consistent Met all season, hitting over .300 and playing his hardest every day. Thole has given the team a spark off the bench, and has played well enough behind the plate to warrant the starting position. If these guys get rewarded, it will send a message to the clubhouse that if you play the game the right way and work hard, moving up on the team is very possible. I’ve never been a professional, semi-professional, or even a high school athlete, but I can’t imagine it feels great to play hard and succeed, only to learn that you can’t move up due to other contracts and commitments. We’ve all been in jobs where someone unworthy gets a position over us due to something other than the work at hand. Maybe it’s knowing the boss, or having a family tie with the company as a whole. Either way, it sucks. It sucks for workers, and it sucks for athletes too. Keeping Perez and Castillo will only enforce that, and moving Pagan and Thole up will give everybody something to strive for.

If the Mets can do all that, they should be competitive next year. A lot of their future is dependent on how well Carlos Beltran comes back from his knee injury, and if Jason Bay can turn it around. But, at the very least, they should be able to get their farm system to be a positive to support the stars.

August 13, 2010 · Filed under MLB

No Comments

Comedy Power Rankings, Part 2

This is Part 2 of a 2-part column, ranking the top comedies of the 09-10 TV year. For Part 1, click here.

Before we start with the final 6 shows, I should mention that I didn’t rank South Park, since it’s never clear exactly what label it should get. But it should be acknowledged that it had an outstanding season, and one of its best in years. If I had ranked it, I probably would have put it between numbers 4 and 5 on this list.

6. 30 Rock Still funny, but the element of surprise seems to be gone here. All of these characters have been used so much that nothing that they do or say seems surprising or even particularly interesting anymore. At this point I get that Liz Lemon is a slob, Tracy Jordan says ridiculous things and Kenneth had a crazy upbringing in the south. What can the show do that’s unique? They’ve tried to bring in guest star after guest star, which has worked to a degree, but even that’s getting boring. They need to shake things up, or things will get stagnant quickly. The jokes are still good, but without caring about the characters, like on The Office, it could be a problem. This show would have easily been number 1 for the last 2 or 3 years, so having it this low either means that a lot of fresh blood has come into the comedy scene (which is true) or that this show has really fallen (also true).

5. Curb Your Enthusiasm It feels like years ago that this was on HBO, but it was only one year ago. Larry David put together one of the best seasons in the show’s run, and the Seinfeld reunion to cap it all off worked nicely. He managed to give each person in the show some moments to shine, as well as leaving a few episodes for his usual craziness. At least three or four of the episodes were instant classics, and this season will be remembered for awhile, even if I almost forgot to put it on this list. The one other thing that I took from this season is how funny Jerry Seinfeld is, and that we may have all forgotten that. Each of the other characters were decent on Curb, but Seinfeld and David’s interplay was what really made the season work. Without him, it wouldn’t have been nearly as well done.

4. The League I may be ranking it a bit high at number 4, since it only had six episodes and was still a bit rough around the edges. But I can’t remember a comedy that has ever represented what it’s like to be a sports fan and to be around a group of male friends as well. This is the first show that has accurately described fantasy football. It’s clear that the writers have actually played, and that really helps. But the most important part of the show was the fact that people that don’t like fantasy football could still enjoy it. There’s a fine line between not having the credibility to produce a legitimate comedy about fantasy football and using it so much that it alienates every other person to the show. The writers managed to maintain that balance, and it paid off. Each character had fantastic moments, and the season finale was possibly the best half hour of TV of the entire season. Before judging this show, watch the finale. It’s on Hulu. I beg you. It’s 22 minutes of pure greatness. Was the overall season of Curb better than League? Very possibly. But the potential that The League shows earned it this spot. The other proof: of every show coming back in the fall, I’m the most excited for either this or Eastbound and Down. For that alone, it deserves this high spot.

3. Parks and Recreation What a difference a year makes! In its first season, Parks and Rec felt sloppy and slow; the ugly sister to The Office. But, in its second season, things changed. In the same way that The Office formed its own identity in its second season, after its first season felt like a copy of the British version, P&R did as well. The first season made Leslie Knope, Amy Poehler’s character, seem too much like Michael Scott, but the writers went away from that this season. Leslie’s coworkers began to respect her, even though she was certainly quirky. A dynamite supporting cast was formed, led by rising star Aziz Ansari and Nick Offerman as boss Ron Swanson. The show got better and better, even as ratings fell. It’s amazing how Community and Parks and Recreation made for one of the finest hours on TV all year, but was one of the lowest rated. Bummer. In Parks’ first season, I felt that it had the same potential that The Office showed in its initial six episodes. They were raw, but had the makings of a great show. Parks and Recreation proved me right, and I can’t wait for it to come back midseason.

Now that we’re down to the final two, it’s time to get down to business. Two shows remain, and they’re by far the best two of the season. Let’s match these two up, in a final showdown, to see which deserves the number 1 spot.

Glee Vs. Modern Family

Pure Comedy: Let’s answer a quick question: which one was funnier? While Glee had great characters and some priceless lines, every character on Modern Family was a riot. The one-liners here were unparalleled. Edge: Modern Family

Characters: This is among the closest calls. Both shows have created so many complex, deep characters that it’s impossible to choose one. The entire Dunphy family was fresh and totally unique, yet Sue Sylvester may be the best character to come along since Tony Soprano…did I just go there? You bet I did! Both shows created such rich characters in one season, that I can’t choose. Edge: Push

Guest Stars: This one’s a blowout. While Fred Willard, Chazz Palminteri and Benjamin Bratt did nice jobs on Modern Family, Glee’s group of stars were unprecedented. Neil Patrick Harris stole an episode, Kristen Chenoweth was fantastic and Idina Menzel added to the show towards the end of the season. Each person brought in was everything the audience could’ve asked for. Big Edge: Glee

Unsung Heroes: For Modern Family, it’s the kids. Phil and Claire’s three kids, along with Manny, Jay and Gloria’s son, brought far more than anyone could’ve expected. Luke and Manny together could be a sitcom in itself. But a certain ex-host of GUTS stole this category. As Kurt’s straight father, Mike O’Malley may have been the best actor on all of Glee, in his unwavering support of his gay son. If I had given you 100 to 1 odds 5 years ago that Mike O’Malley would be nominated for an Emmy as one of the best serious actors on a hit show, would you have taken it? I doubt it, although to quote Kevin on The Office, “I take 100 to 1 odds on anything. If John Cougar Mellencamp ever wins an Oscar, I’m going to be a very rich man.” O’Malley’s been a revelation, and his presence alone put this show on higher ground. Edge: Glee

Overexposure/Burnout: Both of these were big hits in their first season, leading to worries about both of their future. Fortunately, Modern Family has kept a low profile ever since its season finale, quietly showing reruns on ABC and not doing a ton more. Glee, however, has been everywhere. The cast has gone on tour, a book has been released, albums continue to be cranked out, DVD sales are through the roof, and a phenomenon has been born. What worries me about its future is that the song-and-dance element to the show, which I haven’t even mentioned yet, could become too important to the show’s success. While the music was nice, and I’m always a proponent of more Broadway in my life, what made the show were the characters and the humor. If it weren’t for Sue Sylvester, I believe that this show would have failed. If there’s too much music and not enough story, we’ll lose our commitment to the characters and the show will become almost a revue of old music, in an American Idol world. That’s not a good thing. Fortunately, creator Ryan Murphy said this week that he plans on lessening the music for next season, and keeping the focus on the characters. That’s a good sign. But, still: Edge: Modern Family

Degree of Difficulty: For one, Glee is twice as long as Modern Family, so they had double the content to write for the season. Both shows had to be confined within network TV standards, so there’s no edge there. While Modern Family did show heart in many of its episodes, showing us why we should care for the entire Dunphy family, Glee’s ability to mix humor with true emotion was unparalleled. The ability to go back and forth with verbal sparring between Sue Sylvester and Will Schuster, and then deal with legitimate issues like homosexuality and anorexia, was amazing. There were plot holes galore (How did the musicians in the music numbers always know exactly what song the kids were going to sing, when the kids decide to just sing spontaneously? Are they the greatest players in the world? How did the glee club show up for rehearsals every day and have a fully lit stage waiting for them, lighting cues and all? How did they have a constant struggle for money, yet could afford such a detailed lighting and sound system, and then pay for a professional choir to sing behind them occasionally?), but the ability to tackle these problems made up for them. Edge: Glee

And, finally, the last, and most important questions:

Which was more unique? Which could never be duplicated? When I think about this season in 10 years, what will pop up in my mind? Modern Family is an outstanding show, and will have a great shelf life. It’s extremely well written, and it deserves every accolade it gets. But it’s not hard to imagine another smart, funny, well-written show about a big family coming down the pipe in a few years. The show already feels like a relatable mix of 70 percent Arrested Development, and 30 percent The Office, mixing into a nice hybrid. But I can’t compare Glee to anything that I’ve ever seen on TV. It is completely unique, and it feels like a once in a lifetime phenomenon. Glee captured the country’s attention this year, and it’s high points were higher than anything else’s. Modern Family was more consistent, for sure, but Glee is the one that climbed the furthest. I’ll remember that. So, while it was a nail biter:

2. Modern Family

1. Glee

As Sue Sylvester would say, that’s how I see it.

August 9, 2010 · Filed under Pop Culture, Uncategorized

No Comments

Comedy Power Rankings

I’ve considered myself to be a big TV fan for years. From my early years of watching every Nickelodeon show there was, to my more recent years of…watching every Nickelodeon show there is (iCarly and Big Time Rush are outstanding, and I refuse to be told otherwise), I’ve always had an eye on the TV world. But, I realized in the last year that while I’m always on the lookout for new shows to interest me, I have a knack for comedies above all else. Even the dramas that I’ve enjoyed in the past have had strong comedic elements, like The Sopranos, for instance. So, while I may not be an expert in dramas, I have an eye for comedy. It’s been a renaissance year for comedies as a whole, with three strong shows debuting on network TV, as well as another having a major improvement between season 1 and season 2. A new show premiered on cable TV that only had a short run, but has me optimistic of a long, prosperous future for it. With the Emmys about a month away, let’s run down the best shows of the 09-10 season. In reverse order…

First off, here’s the notable comedies of the year that I didn’t watch. I can’t compare them to the shows that I ranked. For fans of these shows, I’m not disrespecting your show by not ranking it; I just can’t without watching it first:

2 and a Half Men, The Big Bang Theory, Weeds, Cougar Town, The Middle, Ugly Betty, Better Off Ted, Hung, Bored to Death.

1,987. Scrubs: Med School I’m having war flashbacks thinking about this show, that was on in the later parts of 2009. Is this what it’s like to come back from Vietnam? Not only was this show a complete and total disaster, but it may have ruined 8 years of one of my favorite shows of all time. The episodes in which Zach Braff returned as JD weren’t awful, but the others were as bad as anything I’ve ever watched. I felt bad for Kerry Bishe, a likable enough girl that was strapped with having to play the main part on this new show, picking up where Zach Braff left. Creator Bill Lawrence and the rest of his staff had moved on to Cougar Town, leaving the remains left for us to watch. Donald Faison and John C. McGinley stayed on, but didn’t have even close to the impact that they had on Scrubs. While the last season of the real Scrubs wasn’t very good, the finale was spectacular. It seemed like Lawrence and Co. had written it for whenever the last season would be, and it was as good as any episode in the show’s history. It left a great taste in my mouth, and it should have been left at that. But the new show came, and I watched like a sap. And I was punished for it. And honestly? I love some of the characters from Scrubs enough that if, in a bizarro universe, the new Scrubs was renewed, I’d probably still watch it. I’m a sucker.

12. Entourage To call this the 12^th best comedy gives it WAY more credit than it deserves. I’m confident that if I watched any of the shows in my list above that they’d be ahead of Entourage on this list. At this point, even reviewing Entourage seems like a waste of time. Ari Gold (Jeremy Piven) remains a fascinating character, although he becomes a bit less interesting each year. Everyone else on the show remains as stagnant as ever, and the stakes for each character have never seemed lower. The last legitimately interesting storyline to come from the show was in 2007, when Medellin tanked at its premiere. Since then, nothing remotely interesting has happened on the show, and every character has gotten his way enough that every obstacle thrown at them seems temporary. If there’s no realistic chance that a character won’t get what he wants, why bother at all? Yet, I continue to watch every week, and will continue to. I think there’s three main reasons why:

1. Summer Programming- There’s not a whole lot to watch on TV over the summer, so Entourage smartly positions itself as the thing to watch. What’s its competition, anyway? Not a ton.

2. No commercials- This may seem stupid in the age of DVR, but it’s nice to just plop down in front of the TV for 30 minutes, shut the brain off and watch a TV show. After each episode, I almost feel like I’m awaking from a nap. It’s a 30 minute period of relaxation, without anything to really think about. In a way, it’s nice.

3. Selection of women- Entourage does this better than any other show on TV. Emmanuelle Chriqui is always some nice eye candy, and Alexis Dziena’s run last year was among the few highlights of the season. Plus, each random girl that gets to live it up with Vincent Chase each week is always fun to look at. This is what constitutes great TV in the barren desert of summer programming.

11. Californication This is a show that isn’t that different from Entourage, but has more likable characters. David Duchovny’s Hank Moody is a far more sympathetic character than anyone on Entourage, playing a frustrated writer trying to keep a family together while dealing with his flawed self. Along with Evan Handler’s Charlie Runkle, this is a likable cast that has the viewers emotionally invested in them. Since actual bad things have happened to each character throughout the show’s run, the stakes actually seem high. This isn’t the funniest show on TV, but it’s a solid, well-rounded show. The first legitimately good show to make the list. The selection in women on this show might not be at Entourage’s level, but it’s a close second.

10. How I Met Your Mother Bit of a down year for this show, after a strong few years before. Still, this show at its best may be better than any show on the list. Two episodes in particular, “The Playbook” and “Perfect Week”, stand out as being as good as it gets. The episodes where Neil Patrick Harris carries the show are usually among the best, such as those two episodes. But, the second half of the season really faltered, with little plot development and too many individual episodes that don’t relate to others. There were also too many guest stars, and while I love Marshall (Jason Segel) and Lilly (Alyson Hannigan), their quest to have a baby wasn’t intriguing. I think the show will turn it around, though, and soon.

9. It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia Another consistent, strong year, from this show that gets away with more on FX than I can remember any show getting away with on either HBO or Showtime. Lots of good things here, but nothing that stands out to put it higher than 9. I’ve described this show as “Seinfeld” with less boundaries, and the main 5-person cast works as well together as any on TV. I wish I had more ways to describe the show, but I really don’t. It’s always a fun half hour. It was overshadowed a bit by the show that followed it on FX , but we’ll get there later.

8. Community It was a rocky first season for the new show on NBC, starring Joel McHale, among others. While it started strongly, it went into a major lull in the middle of the year, to the point that I was able to walk around and do other things while watching it and not fear of missing anything. But, by mid-March, it had regained its early season form and its final month was as good as any network show. Its third-to-last episode, Modern Warfare, was an instant classic. At some point, the show decided to stop taking its characters so seriously and used them to parody different things left and right, and it culminated in this episode. Troy (Donald Glover) and Abed (Daniel Pudi) found ways to be funny even when not caring a ton about their character development. When that can happen, a show really starts to succeed, because it gets the freedom to do whatever it wants without risking judgment on the characters. Unfortunately, Community’s ratings went downhill as the year went on, and its final few, and best, episodes were among the least watched. Hopefully it can rebound in this coming year, or it could be a candidate for cancellation. But, with NBC’s state right now, it wouldn’t be wise to cancel a fresh, funny show that gets good reviews. NBC has done dumber things in the past.

7. The Office This may be a bit high, for how the season went, but I’m biased. The Office is my favorite show of all time, and its second and third season is as good as anything that I’ve ever watched. But it’s slowly gone downhill, not in the quality department, but more so in its humor. There seems to be a need for drama constantly now, and that wasn’t always the case. Instead of highlighting the absolutely fantastic supporting cast, there has been more and more emphasis on real-world problems, such as the shutdown of Dunder Mifflin and the downturn in the economy. That’s made the show less enjoyable as a whole. The acting is still excellent, with Steve Carell putting on a weekly clinic, and Ed Helms is consistently great. Jim and Pam’s romance was a key part of the first few seasons, but with their plotline resolved, they’ve each turned into far less likable people. They’ve gone from being the two people with sanity in an office of crazy people into characters as flawed as everyone else. This isn’t a bad thing, necessarily, but they haven’t given us a reason to root for them. It’s tough for us to root for Jim to prank Dwight in some mean way when we realize how flawed Jim is, as well. In fact, an argument could easily be made that Dwight is a better person than Jim. That’s a bit of a problem. But I love this show and these characters so much that I couldn’t put it any lower than 7^th. With Steve Carell leaving after this season, here’s hoping that it reverts to its old form. We have 22 episodes left with Michael Scott. Let’s make the most of them.

Come back on Friday for Part 2, as I reveal the top six comedies of the 2009-10 year.

August 4, 2010 · Filed under Uncategorized

No Comments